Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 15 de 15
Filter
1.
2023 15th International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, ICCAE 2023 ; : 367-371, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-20237180

ABSTRACT

Deep learning is increasingly gaining traction in cutting-edge medical sciences such as image classification, and genomics due to the high computational performance and accuracy in evaluating medical data. In this study, we investigate the cardiac properties of ECG Images and predict COVID-19 in a binary classification of patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and Normal Persons who tested negative. We analyzed the electrocardiogram (ECG) images by preprocessing the ECG data and building an ECG- Deep Learning- COVID-19 (ECG-DL-COVID) classifier to predict disease. The deep learning models in our experiments constituted CNN, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), and Transfer Learning. Performance evaluation was done to compare the effectiveness of the proposed methodologies with other COVID-19 deep learning-related works. In the three experiments, we achieved an 87% prediction accuracy for MLP, a 90% prediction for CNN and a 93.8% prediction for Transfer Learning. Experimental results and performance evaluation show that the proposed models outperformed previous deep-learning models in the prediction of COVID-19 by a considerable margin. © 2023 IEEE.

2.
Curr Res Environ Sustain ; 4: 100110, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304095
3.
Psychol Addict Behav ; 36(7): 885-894, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296154

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Associations between mood and drinking are part of many theoretical models of problematic alcohol use. Laboratory and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) research on associations between mood and drinking behavior has produced mixed findings, and these constructs are often measured using different methods depending on research context. The present study compares associations between mood and alcohol consumption across research contexts (laboratory vs. daily life) and measurement methods (breathalyzer vs. self-report). METHOD: Forty-five young adults (53% women, Mage = 24.5) who drank moderate-to-heavy amounts completed an alcohol administration session and then 6 weeks of EMA with ambulatory breathalyzer samples. Participants reported their current mood (happy, nervous, upset, and excited) in both the laboratory and during EMA. Momentary, day, and person-level mood variables were examined in multilevel models predicting objective alcohol consumption [breath alcohol concentration (BrAC); lab and EMA] and subjective consumption (self-reported drinking occurrence and number of drinks; EMA). RESULTS: We identified discrepant mood-BrAC associations across laboratory and EMA contexts. Momentary excitement was negatively associated with BrAC in the lab, but positively associated with BrAC during EMA (ps < .01). We also identified discrepancies within EMA depending on the alcohol consumption measure used (BrAC or self-reported number of drinks) and the level of analysis (momentary or day). CONCLUSIONS: Studies testing theoretical models involving directional mood-alcohol associations (e.g., affective reinforcement models) need to carefully consider how research context and methods may influence findings of associations between mood and drinking. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Subject(s)
Affect , Alcohol Drinking , Young Adult , Humans , Female , Adult , Male , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Affect/physiology , Ecological Momentary Assessment , Ethanol/analysis , Breath Tests
4.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0274541, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2029793

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The public health response to the global COVID-19 pandemic has varied widely by region. In Africa, uptake of effective COVID-19 vaccines has been limited by accessibility and vaccine hesitancy. The aim of this study was to compare perceptions of COVID-19 infection and vaccination between pregnant women and non-pregnant adults in four regions of Cameroon, located in Central Africa. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted at urban and suburban hospital facilities in Cameroon. Participants were randomly selected from a convenience sample of adult pregnant and non-pregnant adults in outpatient clinical settings between June 1st and July 14th, 2021. A confidential survey was administered in person by trained research nurses after obtaining written informed consent. Participants were asked about self-reported sociodemographics, medical comorbidities, perceptions of COVID-19 infection, and vaccination. Descriptive statistics were used for survey responses and univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were created to explore factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptability. RESULTS: Fewer than one-third of participants were interested in receiving the COVID-19 vaccine (31%, 257/835) and rates did not differ by pregnancy status. Overall, 43% of participants doubted vaccine efficacy, and 85% stated that the vaccine available in Africa was less effective than vaccine available in Europe. Factors independently associated with vaccine acceptability included having children (aOR = 1.5; p = 0.04) and higher education (aOR = 1.6 for secondary school vs primary/none; p = 0.03). Perceived risks of vaccination ranged from death (33%) to fetal harm (31%) to genetic changes (1%). Health care professionals were cited as the most trusted source for health information (82%, n = 681). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and misinformation in Cameroon was highly prevalent among pregnant and non-pregnant adults in 2021 while vaccine was available but not recommended for use in pregnancy. Based on study findings, consistent public health messaging from medical professionals about vaccine safety and efficacy and local production of vaccine are likely to improve acceptability.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza Vaccines , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cameroon/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Pandemics , Pregnancy , Self Report
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(8): 1462-1466, 2022 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1895806

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy is associated with excess maternal and infant morbidity and mortality in both African and higher-resource settings. Furthermore, mounting evidence demonstrates the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women and infants. However, national guidelines in many African countries are equivocal or lack recommendations on COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy. We summarize key data on COVID-19 epidemiology and vaccination among pregnant African women to highlight major barriers to vaccination and recommend 4 interventions. First, policymakers should prioritize pregnant women for COVID-19 vaccination, with a target of 100% coverage. Second, empirically supported public health campaigns should be sustainably implemented to inform and support pregnant women and their healthcare providers in overcoming vaccine hesitancy. Third, COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women should be expanded to include antenatal care, obstetrics/gynecology, and targeted mass vaccination campaigns. Fourth, national monitoring and evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine uptake, safety, surveillance, and prospective outcomes assessment should be conducted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Humans , Infant , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Prospective Studies , Vaccination
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(11): 1950-1961, 2022 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1895803

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on COVID-19 outcomes among pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), where high-risk comorbidities are prevalent. We investigated the impact of pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection and of SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnancy to generate evidence for health policy and clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a 6-country retrospective cohort study among hospitalized women of childbearing age between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2021. Exposures were (1) pregnancy and (2) a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. The primary outcome for both analyses was intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Secondary outcomes included supplemental oxygen requirement, mechanical ventilation, adverse birth outcomes, and in-hospital mortality. We used log-binomial regression to estimate the effect between pregnancy and SARS-CoV-2 infection. Factors associated with mortality were evaluated using competing-risk proportional subdistribution hazards models. RESULTS: Our analyses included 1315 hospitalized women: 510 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, 403 nonpregnant women with SARS-CoV-2, and 402 pregnant women without SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, pregnancy was associated with increased risk for ICU admission (adjusted risk ratio [aRR]: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.42-4.01), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.44-2.42), and hazard of in-hospital death (adjusted sub-hazard ratio [aSHR]: 2.00; 95% CI: 1.08-3.70). Among pregnant women, SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the risk of ICU admission (aRR: 2.0; 95% CI: 1.20-3.35), oxygen supplementation (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.17-2.11), and hazard of in-hospital death (aSHR: 5.03; 95% CI: 1.79-14.13). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized women in SSA, both SARS-CoV-2 infection and pregnancy independently increased risks of ICU admission, oxygen supplementation, and death. These data support international recommendations to prioritize COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Infant , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Retrospective Studies , Hospital Mortality , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cohort Studies , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology
7.
Journal of Epidemiology and Public Health ; 7(1):17-33, 2022.
Article in English | CAB Abstracts | ID: covidwho-1836439

ABSTRACT

Background: In DR Congo, South Kivu is among cities most affected by Covid 19 with its dense population and common mass movement. This study aimed at investigating the population behavior and practices during the spread period of Corona in South Kivu, East of Democratic Republic of Congo. Subjects dan Method: A cross-sectional analytical study was undertaken in South Kivu province and included 800 hundred individuals. The survey questionnaire was designed and comprised information on independent variables including socio-demographic and socioeconomic parameters, travel history of individuals, and person's history of COVID-19 comorbidity factors. These data were used to explain the dependent variable which was the population behavior and practices which was linked to the COVID-19 positivity or negativity. A rapid test of the COVID-19 antigen for people suspected of having cough and fever followed by RT-PCR tests was conducted. Statistical analyses were performed under R, version 3.5.1.

8.
J Hematol ; 11(1): 15-20, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1771847

ABSTRACT

The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has shaken the entire world. The social, health and financial impacts of this pandemic are beyond words. We have learnt a lot about this new disease in a short period of time, but still a long road to go to fully determine its pathogenic effect. The primary target of this virus is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, which is prevalent in endothelial cells throughout the body. Immunocompromised patients such as patients with sickle cell disease are more vulnerable to severe respiratory infections, including infection with SARS-CoV-2. In addition, sickle cell disease patients are prone to vaso-occlusive crisis, and theoretically SARS-CoV-2 can worsen the situation as it also can cause endothelial dysfunction and thrombosis. Herein, we are sharing an interesting peripheral blood smear finding of an asymptomatic 31-year-old multigravida pregnant female with a history of sickle cell disease and found to have a positive COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test during her third trimester of pregnancy at a routine clinic visit. Two weeks after the initial positive test, she developed nausea, vomiting, constipation and a pain crisis affecting her extremities while her COVID-19 PCR test was still positive. She was hemodynamically stable, and lab workup revealed chronic anemia, leukocytosis with neutrophilia and lymphopenia. Morphologic examination of the peripheral blood smear showed a marked leukoerythroblastosis: rare myeloblasts, sickle cells, markedly abundant nucleated red blood cells (RBCs), metamyelocytes, and many large and giant platelets were seen. In this context, her previous peripheral blood smears (prior to positive COVID-19 test) did not show leukoerythroblastosis. She was managed conservatively with hydration and pain control and delivered at 36 weeks via cesarean section due to pre-term labor and intrauterine growth retardation. The unusual finding of leukoerythroblastosis in a pregnant sickle cell disease patient with an asymptomatic COVID-19 infection indicates further studies to determine its effect on hematopoietic system and elucidate its clinical significance.

9.
2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Science, CDS 2021 ; : 466-471, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1364918

ABSTRACT

This work focuses on the spread and impact of COVID-19 in the black community. A detailed analysis will improve the universality of a comprehensive mitigation strategy in reducing and combatting the spread of coronavirus. Our analysis of COVID-19 spans March 2020 to November 2020. Forecasting computation was based on exponential smoothing. The quality of our models was evaluated using the Mean Absolute Percentage Error. Predominantly black states in the US were considered for the experiment. All things being equal, a forecast to February 2021 suggests a disturbing forecast for the African American communities in the states investigated. © 2021 IEEE.

10.
Respir Med Res ; 79: 100828, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1237866

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic. In absence of official recommendations, implementing daily multidisciplinary team (MDT) COVID-19 meetings was urgently needed. Our aim was to describe our initial institutional standard operating procedures for implementing these meetings, and their impact on daily practice. METHODS: All consecutive patients who were hospitalized in our institution due to COVID 19, from March 31 to April 15, 2020, were included. Criteria to be presented at MDT meetings were defined as a proven COVID-19 by PCR or strongly suspected on CT scan, requiring hospitalization and treatment not included in the standard of care. Three investigators identified the patients who met the predefined criteria and compared the treatment and outcomes of patients with predefined criteria that were presented during MDT meeting with those not presented during MDT meeting. COVID-19 MDT meeting implementation and adhesion were also assessed by a hospital medical staff survey. RESULTS: In all, 318 patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19 were examined in our hospital. Of these, 230 (87%) were hospitalized in a COVID-19 unit, 91 (40%) of whom met predefined MDT meeting criteria. Fifty (55%) patients were presented at a MDT meeting versus 41 (45%) were not. Complementary exploration and inclusion in the CorImmuno cohort were higher in MDT meeting group (respectively 35 vs. 15%, P=0.03 and 80 versus 49%, P=0.0007). Prescription of hydrocortisone hemisuccinate was higher in group of patients not presented during MDT meeting (24 vs. 51%, P=0.007). Almost half of the patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were not presented at MDT meeting, which can be partly explained by technical software issues. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary COVID-19 meetings helped implementing a single standard of care, avoided using treatments that were untested or currently being tested, and facilitated the inclusion of patients in prospective cohorts and therapeutic trials.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Group Processes , Medical Staff, Hospital , Standard of Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , France , Hospitals, University , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
12.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(2): 461-465, 2020 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1000469

ABSTRACT

In the African context, there is a paucity of data on SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated COVID-19 in pregnancy. Given the endemicity of infections such as malaria, HIV, and tuberculosis (TB) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), it is important to evaluate coinfections with SARS-CoV-2 and their impact on maternal/infant outcomes. Robust research is critically needed to evaluate the effects of the added burden of COVID-19 in pregnancy, to help develop evidence-based policies toward improving maternal and infant outcomes. In this perspective, we briefly review current knowledge on the clinical features of COVID-19 in pregnancy; the risks of preterm birth and cesarean delivery secondary to comorbid severity; the effects of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on the fetus/neonate; and in utero mother-to-child SARS-CoV-2 transmission. We further highlight the need to conduct multicountry surveillance as well as retrospective and prospective cohort studies across SSA. This will enable assessments of SARS-CoV-2 burden among pregnant African women and improve the understanding of the spectrum of COVID-19 manifestations in this population, which may be living with or without HIV, TB, and/or other coinfections/comorbidities. In addition, multicountry studies will allow a better understanding of risk factors and outcomes to be compared across countries and subregions. Such an approach will encourage and strengthen much-needed intra-African, south-to-south multidisciplinary and interprofessional research collaborations. The African Forum for Research and Education in Health's COVID-19 Research Working Group has embarked upon such a collaboration across Western, Central, Eastern and Southern Africa.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/virology , Research , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Coinfection/complications , Coinfection/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical , Intersectoral Collaboration , Pregnancy , Pregnant Women , Premature Birth , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Socioeconomic Factors
13.
biorxiv; 2020.
Preprint in English | bioRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2020.04.14.042002

ABSTRACT

IntroductionA novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was recently identified as the pathogen responsible for the COVID-19 outbreak. SARS-CoV-2 triggers severe pneumonia, which leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in severe cases. As reported, SARS-CoV-2 is 80% genetically identical to the 2003 SARS-CoV virus. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) has been identified as the main receptor for entry of both SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 into human cells. ACE2 is normally expressed in cardiovascular and lung type II alveolar epithelial cells, where it positively modulates the RAS system that regulates blood flow, pressure, and fluid homeostasis. Thus, virus-induced reduction of ACE2 gene expression is considered to make a significant contribution to severe acute respiratory failure. Chromatin remodeling plays a significant role in the regulation of ACE2 gene expression and the activity of regulatory elements within the genome. MethodsHere, we integrated data on physical chromatin interactions within the genome organization (captured by Hi-C) with tissue-specific gene expression data to identify spatial expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) and thus regulatory elements located within the ACE2 gene. ResultsWe identified regulatory elements within ACE2 that control the expression of PIR, CA5B, and VPS13C in the lung. The gene products of these genes are involved in inflammatory responses, de novo pyrimidine and polyamine synthesis, and the endoplasmic reticulum, respectively. ConclusionOur study, although limited by the fact that the identification of the regulatory interactions is putative until proven by targeted experiments, supports the hypothesis that viral silencing of ACE2 alters the activity of gene regulatory regions and promotes an intra-cellular environment suitable for viral replication.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Pneumonia , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19 , Death , Respiratory Insufficiency
14.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 145(10): 687-692, 2020 05.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-30761

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented challenges for the German health care system. What is already the case in some other countries, may occur in Germany in the near future also: Faced with limited ICU resources, doctors will be forced to decide which patients to treat and which to let die. This paper examines the legal implications of such decisions. It takes up arguments from the general discussion on prioritization in medicine. A constitutional hurdle for the application of utilitarian criteria (in particular patients' age or social role) comes from the principle that every human life is of equal value and must not be traded off against others ("life value indifference"). However, the limits that the Grundgesetz (German Basic Law) sets for state actions do not apply directly to doctors. According to the Musterberufsordnung (professional code of conduct), doctors act based on their conscience and the requirements of medical ethics and humanity. The implications of this normative standard for the prioritizing in an exceptional situation as the COVID 19 pandemic have not been sufficiently clarified. This uncertainty leads to emotional and moral burdens for doctors. The authors conclude that the German law grants a limited freedom of choice that allows physicians to apply utilitarian criteria in addition to purely medical decision algorithms.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Decision Making/ethics , Ethics, Medical , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Resource Allocation/ethics , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Cost of Illness , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Germany , Humans , Legislation, Medical , Pandemics , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Resource Allocation/legislation & jurisprudence , SARS-CoV-2 , Value of Life
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL